Like the force with which the anonymous defend football, this is because I share dispassionately the interpretation they give, we give the football and all sports.
introduction to the appeal was not the intention, I repeat, "humiliate" the sport and its meaning, but to criticize a business, let me explain ...
The Africa that I know has taught me that wants to change, but change needs of autonomy, trust and respect, needs to organize itself and to be vacated, if not supported, stimulated in thinking and practice your change, a change from low to invade almost always corrupt lobbyists who invade "the stairs" of those systems. Now, whether in sport or any other instrument that is the direction in which I believe should go to "aid", the "answers".
So why the motion should be ABAHALAI that sort? Why
using astronomical resources and valuable space for development abnormal and useless?
Who chooses how to choose? What do you see? How do you see?
because repression of all kinds, instead of listening and participation?
I can not think that this is the right price to pay because so few million people in Africa who finally discovers things are not going well there, I'm sorry that the multimillion-dollar business centers of the world still very much with the sport that unites, creates a climate of change.
Some spoke of ethical and social change, I believe, but I do not think FIFA is much less his spotlight, his advertising campaigns "right" to be able to trigger this process, at least if not at the same time as to make way for people to freely organize to change things, just not happening in South Africa and forgive me but comes back to a beautiful, enormous house of cards.
Tell me, anonymous, when the world is changed as well, such as "good" intentions did turn things, perhaps in front of a cafe in the newsroom, so maybe there comes out some good ideas to change the world.
introduction to the appeal was not the intention, I repeat, "humiliate" the sport and its meaning, but to criticize a business, let me explain ...
The Africa that I know has taught me that wants to change, but change needs of autonomy, trust and respect, needs to organize itself and to be vacated, if not supported, stimulated in thinking and practice your change, a change from low to invade almost always corrupt lobbyists who invade "the stairs" of those systems. Now, whether in sport or any other instrument that is the direction in which I believe should go to "aid", the "answers".
So why the motion should be ABAHALAI that sort? Why
using astronomical resources and valuable space for development abnormal and useless?
Who chooses how to choose? What do you see? How do you see?
because repression of all kinds, instead of listening and participation?
I can not think that this is the right price to pay because so few million people in Africa who finally discovers things are not going well there, I'm sorry that the multimillion-dollar business centers of the world still very much with the sport that unites, creates a climate of change.
Some spoke of ethical and social change, I believe, but I do not think FIFA is much less his spotlight, his advertising campaigns "right" to be able to trigger this process, at least if not at the same time as to make way for people to freely organize to change things, just not happening in South Africa and forgive me but comes back to a beautiful, enormous house of cards.
Tell me, anonymous, when the world is changed as well, such as "good" intentions did turn things, perhaps in front of a cafe in the newsroom, so maybe there comes out some good ideas to change the world.
ALICE
0 comments:
Post a Comment