Dear Alice, I wish that with Over time, the decrease in tension in the world so that we can all be safer. But unfortunately it is not so, tension worsens more and more forecasts are not the best.
Prepare a war in Iran. This for some may not be a mystery, but perhaps the manner and timing are a bit 'more. Others will say that we are paranoid, and we will be happy if they have reason. Prepare a war in Iran, engineered by the U.S. with the support of its armed wing in the eastern crescent, Israel.
E 'for some time that the U.S. push to tighten economic sanctions against Tehran in order to prevent them from developing nuclear technology, even if Iran has always said you want to do for civil purposes. But the pressures were not used to anything, and Iran continues. You know Alice, is the U.S. who decide who can and can not have nuclear power. Think, says imposing sanctions on Iran that want to do this for civilian purposes and do not do it with Israel that did it for military purposes. And you know why not penalties? Because Israel has not signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), while Iran has done. Does not it seem a little 'illogical? And it makes no sense, but now we are accustomed to these things for some time.
The problem is that Israel is in a hurry. And maybe the U.S. too. On the other hand, if Israel is to take military action, the image of the U.S. model of democracy does not lose out enormously. But there is anyone still believe that? Today we read on the website of "repubblica.it" according to the U.S. that Iran could build two nuclear bombs by 2012. But, regardless of the fact that all the experts deny this possibility, is there anyone who still believes the U.S.? But back to the point, Israel wants to do soon, and needs to guarantee its success. The U.S. on the other hand will have to think about the possibility, namely: a) soft war, so as to bring down the government and replace it as with a more "friend" or, b) open and endless war (see Iraq or Afghanistan) and then handsome profits for oil companies and arms manufacturers. In both cases, peace for Israel. At least in theory. Why another war would make the area very dangerous in the world, a veritable time bomb.
We heard from a complaint made by Fidel Castro in his "Reflections" day, which began as the World Cup, Saudi Arabia signed a treaty with Israel to allow them to use their airspace and to do military exercises in the same (in a news release for more REPORTS: The Times and A. Arabia was quick to deny). Castro said the conflict is "ad portas". He speaks of the terrible war that breaks out, it would be nuclear and generalized, and the fuse could be just a provocation of the U.S. in this case include: inspection, on the high seas, some Iranian ships. The answer would be a rain of missiles. According to him, maybe we will not get to watch the quarter-finals of the World Cup. Of course, we know that he puts his hands on, but it does not without foundation.
According to some scholars of geopolitics, Israel needs to bomb a hole where the central is enriched uranium. This gap could be Saudi Arabia or Turkey . The position of Jordan Sunni moderate and pro U.S., in this case, there is unknown. And, from Syria Shia, we know that you can not. Meanwhile, the G20 Turkey declares that it has just closed its airspace to Israel, in response to the attack of the "Freedom Flotilla". It will be a coincidence? The problem is that the operation can start from Saudi Arabia, but do not return to them. So if you can not pass from Turkey, the only alternative is to return from Iraq and then Jordan. It 's a fact that only Jordan is required to dispel these fears.
In addition to bomb the facilities where it enriches uranium, Israel needs nuclear weapons to small size. Some of the bunkers are made by the Soviets to 30m below ground, so you have to enter the ventilation pipes. And the U.S. has the plans, that's for sure. So far as we know, the first bombing "flash" technologies (peak) nuclear "low".
How will this story? Hard to say? I do not think that the alarm Here we run is idle, and we have sufficient evidence to nourish legitimate concerns. In any case, and as usual, I can only say: "I hope, however, be wrong."
0 comments:
Post a Comment